Monday, September 11, 2006

A short take

I was told today that something I wrote cannot and will not be published.

There is a column in my newspaper which my colleagues and I take turns to write. Sometimes we comment on serious current affairs, sometimes we share little snippets of life, sometimes we write about light hearted issues.

The other day, I did a short take on a news report I did recently. Unfortunately, it will never live to see daylight.


Not because what I wrote was not good (although nobody said it was good either), but because, as I was told, if it was published, it may have a damaging impact on the person (let’s name him X) I commented on, and the after effects might prove damaging to myself as well.

In a mild case, X may never accept an interview by me again, and in a more serious case scenario, the mega organization where X works under may not want me to cover their news in future.

The fact that I penned it down meant that I was prepared to face whatever repercussions there are to come. The mild and serious scenarios went through my head before I wrote my piece, but I wrote it anyway.

Perhaps this is the kind of liberal journalism I hope to see. Perhaps this is the kind of journalist I want to be.

I was never one who broke rules back in school. But that does not mean I did not debate and argue on the need for more flexibility and openness.

I do not like to conform or adhere to old systems or the usual ways of doing things, just for the sake of convenience. The older I get, the more I am sure about this.

Perhaps it is this rebellious streak in me that makes me cut out to be a journalist. I enjoy the feeling of treading on a thin line between what can and what cannot be done.

But sometimes, one person’s strength is not enough. As I had learnt.

In case you think that I wrote about some big shot or some important political figure, do not be mistaken. X is in fact, a rather ordinary person, and I consider my piece to be rather subtle.

But I need to be more subtle. I was told.

Sigh.

I certainly do not want to jeopardize my career, not at the expense of a trivial case, but neither will I be contented being somebody else’s mouthpiece.

This whole incident has taught me some important lessons.

That I am still a greenhorn.
That I have yet to master how to look at things from a broader and wider perspective.
That I have to think before I leap.

There is still a long way to go for certain systems which have been well in place. For now, they will remain.

5 Comments:

At 5:39 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Eh, by the way, really cannot say who is X? I am wondering how many people know your blog... what if some unknown, unfriendly journalists pop by to take a look?

 
At 5:44 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, I read your coloumns in the newspapers regularly... I thought the 'harmless-daily-routine-little-things-in-life that we don't take notice of usually but you point them out' suit you more than those articles widely written, like Zoe Tay's 'I Swallow'. Not that you're not as good as the other writers, but too most people have wriiten on them and it would be a direct comparison no matter how wide and objective your perspectives may be. Going in that direction would create a niche for you. Also, you're good at that; some journalists tried to write in that style but nah, it's not their style. Gosh, I hope other journalists aren't reading...

 
At 2:25 PM , Blogger yvonne said...

jk: That's the weird thing, I did not write about govt or any related bodies. haha...

anonymous: I sure hope no unfriendly journalists pop by!

anonymous: When I write, I don't really think like "I want to write this because everyone is talking about it". I only write if I really have an opinion.
Really thanks for your encouragement. It sure feels good to know that someone enjoys it. =)

 
At 6:14 PM , Blogger fr said...

Since your senior thinks it may have damaging impact on the person I feel it should not be published although it might look harmless to you.

 
At 1:32 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I swore that if I ever step into journalism, I will never work in SPH. It's a stubborn mentality, but I just don't think that the journalism we have is real journalism. To me, there is no such thing as liberal journalism. It's either there is journalism, or there isn't (or, there is propaganda). ^^

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home