Monday, August 22, 2005

Will you support Weilian?

Project Superstar was the talk of the town over the weekend. I mentioned about this competition in my previous post “Will he be the next Superstar?” (28/6/2005). At that time, I was sure HE would not get anywhere near the finals. It was now proven that I was very wrong.

HE is Chen Weilian (Kelvin Tan), 23, otherwise known as the blind busker.

In case you have not watched the show, let me give a brief recap. He was one of the two male finalists in the contest that was aired last Wednesday. Both sang three songs in the 1½ hour contest. Hot favourite NUS undergraduate Ang Junyang, 24, took home an average score of 40.7, while Tan had a score of 37. These scores were awarded by a panel of five judges, which stood 30% of the competition results. The other 70% came from viewers’ votings.

In the end, Tan took the crown.

For the last few days, a lot of viewers were unhappy about the results. Most felt that the voting system was unfair because Ang had performed better in the finals, and that Tan won due to sympathy votes. Others felt that Singaporeans should not be biased towards Tan just because of his disability.

In the female rounds, air stewardess Kelly Poon, 22, won the female crown with an average score was 38.7, while her rival Singaporean PR Chew Sin Huey, 24, effortlessly got 42.5 points.

Both Tan and Poon scored lower scores than their rivals and both won the contest. Why were there less disagreements and unhappiness on Poon’s victory than Tan?

In my opinion, I think it is because although Poon did not get a score as high as Chew, but she is in general the one with more star appeal. One could sing better while the other has more star quality. In a nutshell, they were on par with each other. Whereas for Tan and Ang, it is clear to most neutral viewers who fits the bill of a Superstar more appropriately.

Both Tan and Ang were sick during the finals. Ang was a flop on his first song, but sang increasingly well for his second and third songs, despite a sore throat. Tan who had a bad flu, did average for his three songs. Over lunch the other day, I overheard someone saying, “Both were sick, but of course it would be more difficult for Tan to overcome it.”

Although Tan’s supporters are crying out to others not to place emphasis on his disability, but would it be possible to draw the line between him and his disability? Let’s face it. If Tan had been another normal contestant, would there have been so much controversies over his triumph?

Tan’s sister said after the competition, “Do not be place the emphasis on what Weilian cannot do, but think of how he can make you feel touched with his voice.”

It would have been possible if we have not seen Tan perform on stage before, and he could be marketed as an unconventional, behind-the-scene singer like Ocean Ou. But now? Would it still be possible?

It seems that a lot of Tan’s supporters had voted for him because of his courage and fighting spirit. Perhaps the determination and perseverance that Tan possesses, to disregard his lack of vision, to stand on stage and compete with other normal contestants is what Singaporeans want to see, and to be motivated. Some also feel that with Tan's emergence, people with disability could finally be integrated and accepted into mainstream society. To many, Tan is like a hero and idol, because he has shown that people who are handicapped, could still fight for their dreams. And his supporters are helping him to achieve it.

I must say that Tan has done a wonderful feat, to gel Singaporeans up, and to make Singaporeans stand up and say, "Let's be fair to one and all, regardless of their disabilities." That is worth our salutes.

But my question is, should this be the way we choose our Superstar? No doubt Tan can sing well, and perhaps, everyone has their own way of defining a “Superstar”. But to all those who have supported Tan out of sympathy, I only have these words for you, “This is a contest, not charity.”

And as my friend puts it aptly, “If Ang or Poon wins the contest, they will just be an addition to the current music scene like Stephanie Sun, Lin Jun Jie or Ah Du, nothing special. But when Tan wins, it would be a different story.” Indeed.

The grand final between Poon and Tan will take place on 1st September at the Indoor Stadium. Both have released their CD singles on Saturday, and the sales of the CD will make up 30% of the votes, while 70% will rely on viewers’ votes on that day.

Well, from the way things are going, I would not be surprised if Tan clinches the top spot during the finals.

13 Comments:

At 1:45 PM , Blogger Ellipsis said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 1:47 PM , Blogger Ellipsis said...

interesting post. I'm reminded of clay aiken's gravity-defying popularity amongst all AI winners over 4 seasons. but what really made him special was not so much his crystal-clear voice, but the person he wanted to be before-and-after the show (I'm a fan too).

I haven't seen the project superstar performances, but I do think the word "superstar" for chen weilian is fitting. if a man is able to motivate the masses and move the numbers, I would give him the "superstar" tag gladly. so, perhaps in time to come chen weilian will continue to surprise us, and let's hope so too.:)

 
At 10:23 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Weilian can sing much better than Kelly... hopes the better singer wins this time.. haha..

 
At 7:49 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

If junyang had scored lower than weilian in the finals and yet still get voted in the grand final, I bet there wouldn't be so much row and commotion over the grading criteria and voting system...

some singaporeans out there just couldn't accept the fact that their idol lost to a handicapped person, despite showing more star quality and being more packagable. Duhz.

 
At 12:08 AM , Blogger yvonne said...

ball of yarn: well said...but perhaps weilian should be called a "people's star", rather than superstar...

cannon: I think kelly sang pretty well for the first few rounds until recently when she did not seem to perform that well...perhaps we have too high expectations of her after having done so well right at the start... But can Weilian really sing better? I have my doubts on that though...

ron: i guess most people, myself included, still think that "superstar" refers to an idol, who has the looks, the singing talent and the ability to stage a performance...which is why there has been so much unhappiness on this issue...

 
At 10:54 AM , Blogger piglet said...

i agree that weilian does not sing tt well. casting the issue of his handicap aside, he only sings well in that few categories of songs. most of the times, it feels like he is reading off the lyrics one word at a time...there is little sense of flow in his singing. even if i close my eyes and listen to junyang and weilian sing, junyang still sings much better.

 
At 7:35 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

actually since the first day i heard kelly sang, i just find her average.. there are so many occasions during the quarter and semi finals that i found she sang out of tune.. going out of tune easily just puts me off.. whatever the singer does.. the least he or she needs to do is to sing in key and do not go out of tune.. and she still cannot do that even up to now.. i just find that she is an overrated singer..

 
At 9:41 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Overall, I think that Junyang displayed a higher level of versatility throughout the various stages of the contest. But hey, I'm in no position to complain, 'cos I did not vote for either of them...

One interesting phenomenome is that both contestants with the lower score gets MORE votes from the viewers. This may become a strategy (a.k.a psychological warfare?) for future contestants!

 
At 2:22 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

well, i guess regardless of what the results are... or who sings better, or who has more qualities of a superstar...

the people have already spoken...

and weilian is the more popular one.

since the weightage of the contest is more on popularity, rather than who sings better (as judged by the professionals), then we shld respect the programme producers as well as the public and accept this truth.

theres always a winner and loser in contests. of coz, there are also sore losers and sore supporters of losers. there is nothing we can do to stop this. but endless discussion about results that have already been announced is completely futile. nothing can be done to reverse the outcome.

as to whether weilian or junyang possesses greater superstar quality, or greater success in the entertainment field, time will tell.

 
At 2:30 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

oh yah... would like to add another point also...

yeah, some pple may call it sympathy votes... but the fact that pple choose to give (sympathy) votes to weilian, instead of junyang (who is perceived to have greater star appeal), does show that weilian has in a way, moved the hearts of those pple. perhaps he didnt move them with his 'star' qualities... but he still managed to endear the hearts of some pple in his own way... perhaps with his determination :)

and perhaps... we shld all just give him the credits... and stop this endless discussion abt whether he deserves to win...

becoz, like wat i said... the pple have already chosen the winner...

yeah, and i would like to add... i support neither junyang nor weilian... i'm more interested in the female contest actually... haha :p

--sookmay

 
At 11:09 PM , Blogger yvonne said...

haha, well said "Caring"!

 
At 9:37 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

agree that Tan was not bad and he try his very best to give what he can for the contest but if u really listen hard,i feel that Ang is a better one. in my heart, Ang is a idol and a Superstar ....anyway, good post(entry)that really worth commenting on..

 
At 1:15 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

As a disabled person, of course, I wouldn't want to be voted out of sympathy. I want to be recognised for my talent, not cos of my disablity.

I want to be given chances to show my talent and earn merits on my talents, not cos of my disablity.

I do not want my disablity to incur discrimation in people. For e.g, if he has the singing talent, really good but still dun deserve votes, it is not fair.

But if his singing is so-so, then dun vote for him.

So look at talents, not disability.

I am sorry if my comments sound very aggravated .

Well, I am speaking out my opinions.....

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home