Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Being a Crime Desk Journalist

How time flies.

I have been working as a crime desk journalist for six months.

Rushing to murder scenes and accident sites are part and parcel of my job. It is also a “normal” affair to be scolded or yelled at by grieving victims’ families. But more often than not, we simply get ignored.

Some people ask me whether I feel upset having to face gory or tragic scenarios every other day.

I don’t, seriously. That’s because I understand the meaning of my job, and I know where my responsibility lies.

When one’s beloved family member has passed away, it is understandable that while coping with sorrow, no one wants to face endless questioning by an “annoying” reporter. But journalists are human beings too, and we do feel sympathetic as well. But we have a job to do, and our job is to cover the news and inform the public.

What has happened has happened.

Many a times, questions like: “what really happened, what could have been done, can the public be educated or learn something through this piece of news”, can only be answered with the aid of media reports.

These are meaningful lessons I have learnt from my job. As 2006 has just begun, I did a reflection of my past year being a rookie journalist: three experiences were in particular most “unforgettable”.

1) Most terrifying


When I was still very new on the job and was on one of my first few night shifts, I got a call at 3am. I was sleeping soundly when my phone suddenly rang. I nearly jumped out of bed. What I heard a few seconds later virtually scared me out of my wits.

“Hello Yvonne, I don’t want to scare you, but a murder just took place at Commonwealth Drive. Would you like to come down now?”

What? Murder? At 3am in the morning? Are you joking?

When I rushed to the murder scene, the accused has been brought away by the police. Everywhere was dark, quiet and peaceful (well, what do you expect at the wee hours of the day?). There was no bloody and gruesome scene as I had imagined on my way there.

That was the first murder case I covered.

2) Most maddening


There was this case where a 62 year old cobbler used a fake $1 cheque to con a 21 year old Vietnamese bride into having sex with him, on pretext of marrying her. He used to set up his stall in Bishan Central, and I was sent down to interview residents in that area.


I held his photograph which was published in newspapers and went around interviewing people.

It was then when I met this disgusting old man. He looked at me from head to toe and said “excitedly”, “So you are the Vietnamese bride? How were you cheated exactly?”

For goodness sake! I told him repeatedly that I am a journalist but he simply lived in his own world and continue to throw me “revolting” looks. Yucks! If I had not been sent on a mission, I would have given him a good dressing down for being so abhorrent!

3) Most unexpected

Unexpected assignments dot my life as a crime reporter. But the most “unexpected” thing that has happened to me so far is neither a grisly murder case nor a grave accident.

It was when a victim’s family member showed concern for me. I guess most crime reporters are so used to being “ticked off” while on their job, that to be “cared for” seemed too unbelievable.

In that particular case, a man had suffered a sudden death and I was at his wake to find out more from his daughter. I was at a loss of words to console her, but to my surprise, she actually showered concern on me at the end of the interview.

“It is so late and you still have to cover news? It must be hard on you.”

When I heard that, all feelings of fatigue vanished. I felt warmth in my heart.


I love my job, and these little things give me the drive to strive harder on.


15 Comments:

At 12:19 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are lessons to be learnt all the time, it's really up to you to pause, think about the daily happenings and sift out the lessons.

I hope I can be like you, being able to appreciate your job and to find meaningful lessons in my work. =)

 
At 1:42 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You say you are sympathetic to the distressed family members and then claimed you have a job to do. Does it mean you will continue with your persistent questioning regardless of how depressed they are?

Shouldn't you be more tactful and empathize with them?

 
At 4:35 PM , Blogger yvonne said...

k.m: it does not mean that journalists cannot be sympathetic while carrying out their duties. It is true that more often than not, distressed family members do not want to accept interviews, but we do not insist if they refuse.

Professional journalists are not paparazzi, they do not come across as aggressive and cold-hearted beings. At least those I know are not.

 
At 11:15 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know what you mean.. The little things can really make your day all worthwhile, no matter how tired/stressed you may be... jia you! :)

yz

 
At 11:23 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I guess the job requirements of a journalist require the person to be thick-skinned and tactless in certain awkward situations, in order to reveal as much updated news to the public as possible.

By maintaining cool when facing angry families, or controlling your emotions when dealing with weeping widows or orphons, and getting your job done well at the same time, That's called career professionalism.

It's not a feat that can be achieved by any Tom, Dick or Harry, so thumbs up to you Yvonne!

 
At 1:41 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey,I thought that you are a journalist writing articles abt people, what is so special abt them, etc....

Well,if I am grieved, no mood to talk or answer questions...Will be in more foul mood if journalists continue to irk me with persistent questions.

But on other hand, it is ur job to do, I understand. Have to write abt crimes to inform people.

 
At 10:13 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

journalists can also slant an article to show as if one party is uncoorperative and unreasonable.

you seem to be responsible and caring

but of course you won't write something that reflect unfavourably on yourself

 
At 6:39 AM , Blogger Kevin said...

wah your job more exciting than I tot...

jiayouZ

 
At 8:44 AM , Blogger yvonne said...

anonymous: An issue can be looked at in different ways, and a piece of news can be approached in different news angles. I wouldn't call that "slanting" an article. Nevertheless, I do agree that there exists some black sheep among the journalists who "twist" certain facts in order to suit themselves.

 
At 1:28 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Singapore press is generally alright. Most of our journalists report news based on facts and not on personal opinions. It's not like those Taiwanese paparazzi who immediately jump to imaginary conclusions based on some photos they have.

It'll be hard to slant an article without incurring undesired consequences from involved party. Somemore Singaporeans like to complain so much. If the press write something wrong or unfavorable, SPH immediately faces a lawsuit.

I'm sure you guys will remember how Durai tried to sue the reporter for slanting he had a golden tap installed for personal usage. Turns out Durai is in the wrong!

 
At 12:52 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think only a journalist should comment on a journalist. Because only when you were or are in a career itself,than can you truly empathise with the individual.

 
At 1:42 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

'only a journalist should comment on a journalist' ?

If we apply to others, then no one in one profession or job should comment on anyone in another profession or job.

So journalists also cannot comment other professions.

 
At 10:48 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or rather, only a journalist can pass judgement on another journalist for his or her professional competency. Similarly, a doctor may face certain medical complications, and his diagnosis can only be critiqued by another doctor in similar capacity.
Basically a piece of article is a piece of information. While the journalist may interpret it in one way he or she percieved as the best way to bring across the information to the public, this piece of information is subjected to numerous interpretations by readers who accord different meanings because of their own background, experiences, etc.
So readers and external parties can only justly comment on the results as interpreted from their own perspective,but not on the journalist. And yes, a good journalist should not comment on other professions. He or she should only report the facts and let the public come to their own judgement about the issue.

 
At 12:20 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"only a journalist can pass judgement on another journalist for his or her professional competency" ?

so if there is a court case involving a journalist's professional competency, does it mean only journalists can be witnessess or even the judge must also be a former journalist?

not 'pass judgement' lah, 'express his views' only

even specialist doctors won't judge another specialist in the same field - he would only say this is appropriate or not appropriate according to his experience...

 
At 5:27 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think you are perhaps missing the point.
Here, I mean judgements on professional competency.
'even specialist doctors won't judge another specialist in the same field - he would only say this is appropriate or not appropriate according to his experience...'
It means the specialist doctor is critiquing, in other words, passing judgements on the other doctor on Professional Competency. When he or she comments whether this piece of work is good or bad,what revisions are needed etc he or she is passing a judgement.

Yes, if a journalist is brought to court, he can only be judged if he has fulfilled his professional duty as a journalist.

Ordinary parties have to raise evidence of negligence etc: they don't make the judegements. Only judges do, after reviewing similar journalisit cases, which again boil down to the point: Judgements on professional competency should be passed only by experienced and knowledgeable parties who can empathise with the other individual.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home